<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gin Riot &#187; new york observer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginriot.com/tag/new-york-observer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginriot.com</link>
	<description>Comedy Collaboration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Film Review &#8211; Sex and the City 2</title>
		<link>http://www.ginriot.com/2010/05/film-review-sex-and-the-city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ginriot.com/2010/05/film-review-sex-and-the-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 17:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuff of the Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[globe and mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark kermode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york observer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex and the city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex and the city 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginriot.com/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s fair to say that the first Sex and the City film divided the critics. Some said it was &#8220;vulgar, shrill, deeply shallow — and, at 2 hours and 22 turgid minutes, overlong.&#8221; (Manohla Dargis of The New York Times) Others said it was &#8220;uniquely bad; this one is a threshold-breaker with a different sound, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fair to say that the first <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_the_City_%28film%29" target="_blank">Sex and the City</a> film divided the critics. Some said it was &#8220;vulgar, shrill, deeply shallow — and, at 2 hours and 22 turgid minutes, overlong.&#8221; (Manohla Dargis of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/05/30/movies/20080530_SEXANDTHECITY_FEATURE.html" target="_blank">The New York Times</a>)</p>
<p>Others said it was &#8220;uniquely bad; this one is a threshold-breaker with a different sound,  the crack of rock-bottom giving way to a whole deeper layer of magma.&#8221; (Rick Groen of <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/movies/sex-and-the-city-2-sexless-in-two-cities/article1580522/" target="_blank">The Globe and Mail</a>)</p>
<p>And the movie featured on several worst of 2008 lists including that of <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/film_reviews/article7136358.ece" target="_blank">The Times</a>, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/markkermode/2008/06/sex_lies_and_merchandise.html" target="_blank">Mark Kermode</a>, <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/carrie-kid" target="_blank">The New York Observer</a> and <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100040525/sex-and-the-city-is-about-as-feminist-as-a-copy-of-playboy/" target="_blank">The Daily Telegraph</a>.</p>
<p>But what about <a href="http://www.sexandthecitymovie.org/" target="_blank">Sex and the City 2</a>? What&#8217;s THAT like as a film, you may well ask?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s shit. No stars (out of 5)</p>
<!-- Start Shareaholic ClassicBookmarks Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic ClassicBookmarks Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ginriot.com/2010/05/film-review-sex-and-the-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
